جامعه شناسی آموزش و پرورش

دو فصلنامه علمی جامعه شناسی آموزش و پرورش

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

اخبار و اعلانات

ارزیابی نشریه

ارائه مدل مسئولیت اجتماعی با استفاده از روش فراترکیب

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکترای مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، واحد کرمان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرمان، ایران

2 استادیار گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، واحد کرمان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرمان، ایران

3 استادیار گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، واحد خمین، دانشگاه ازاد اسلامی، خمین، ایران

4 دانشیار گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، واحد کرمان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرمان، ایران

10.22034/ijes.2021.541141.1179

چکیده

هدف: مسئولیت اجتماعی یک پارادایم نسبتا جدید مدیریتی است که در آن به ایجاد کسب‌وکار مسئولانه و متعهدانه تاکید می‌شود. بنابراین، پژوهش حاضر با هدف ارائه مدل مسئولیت اجتماعی با استفاده از روش فراترکیب انجام شد.
روش‌شناسی: این مطالعه از نظر زمانی از نوع مقطعی، از نظر هدف از نوع کاربردی و از نظر شیوه اجرا از نوع کیفی با استفاده از روش فراترکیب بود. جامعه پژوهش منابع مرتبط با مسئولیت اجتماعی در 20 سال اخیر بودند که از میان 200 مقاله موجود با توجه به ملاک‌های مورد نظر و تعداد 3 مرحله پالایش تعداد 42 مقاله با روش هدفمند به‌عنوان نمونه انتخاب شدند. داده‌ها با کمک مرور اسناد و یادداشت‌برداری از مقاله‌ها جمع‌آوری که پایایی یافته‌ها با کمک ضریب توافق بین دو کدگذار 86/0 بدست آمد و در نهایت، داده‌ها با روش تحلیل مضمون در نرم‌افزار MAXQDA-10 تحلیل شدند.
یافته‌ها: یافته‌های پژوهش حاضر نشان داد که مسئولیت اجتماعی تعداد 65 شاخص، 41 مقوله و 7 بعد داشت که شامل ابعاد اقتصادی (6 مقوله)، اخلاقی (8 مقوله)، محیط‌زیستی (8 مقوله)، کارکنان (6 مقوله)، نهادهای نظارتی (5 مقوله)، جامعه (5 مقوله) و نهادهای حاکمیتی (3 مقوله) بود. در نهایت، مدل مسئولیت اجتماعی با استفاده از روش فراترکیب طراحی شد.
بحث و نتیجه‌گیری: نتایج پژوهش حاضر نشان‌دهنده 7 بعد اقتصادی، اخلاقی، محیط‌زیستی، کارکنان، نهادهای نظارتی، جامعه و نهادهای حاکمیتی برای مدل مسئولیت اجتماعی بود. مدیران و مسئولان سازمانی با کمک ابعاد شناسایی‌شده در پژوهش حاضر می‌توانند زمینه را برای بهبود مسئولیت اجتماعی در سازمان خود فراهم آورند.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Presenting a Social Responsibility Model with Using the Meta-Combined Method

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Ali Bayati 1
  • Saeed Sayadi 2
  • Ebrahim Givaki 3
  • Sanjar Salajeghe 4
  • Amin Nikpour 2

1 PhD Student in Public Administration, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Humanities, Khomein Branch, Islamic Azad University, Khomein, Iran

4 Associate Professor, Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Kerman Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kerman, Iran

چکیده [English]

Purpose: Organizations, as intermediate links between people and society, are important and fundamental components of today's human social body, which need people and society to survive and continue their activities. In the traditional perspective, the focus of the governance makers is based on maximizing the profit of the shareholders, and for this purpose, they seek to establish laws to structure the relations between the board of directors, shareholders and managers and to resolve possible conflicts between them, but in the new perspective, the perspective goes further and is based on It is necessary to consider the consequences of the organization's governance decisions in all stakeholders and all economic, social and environmental dimensions. Social responsibility is a relatively new management paradigm that emphasizes creating a responsible and committed business. Therefore, the present study was conducted with the aim of presenting a social responsibility model with using the meta-combined method.
Methodology: This study in terms of time was cross-sectional, in terms of purpose was applied and in terms of implementation method was qualitative with using the meta-combination method. The research population was resources related to social responsibility in the last 20 years, which from among 200 available articles according to the desired criteria and the 3 stages of refinement, number of 42 articles were selected as a sample by purposive method. Data were collected by reviewing documents and taking notes from articles, which the reliability of the findings was obtained using the agreement coefficient between the two coders 0.86 and finally, the data were analyzed by themes analysis method in MAXQDA-10 software.
Findings: Findings of the present study showed that social responsibility had 65 indicators, 41 categories and 7 dimensions, that were included economic (6 categories), ethical (8 categories), environmental (8 categories), staff (6 categories), regulatory institutions (5 categories).  society (5 categories) and governing institutions (3 categories). Finally, the social responsibility model with using the meta-combined method was designed.
Conclusion: The results of the present study indicated the 7 dimensions of economic, ethical, environmental, staff, regulatory institutions, society and governing institutions for the social responsibility model. Organizational officials and managers with the help of the identified dimensions in the present study can provide the basis for improving social responsibility in their organization.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Social Responsibility
  • Meta-combined
  • Ethical
  • Environmental
مراجع
Arazmjoo H, Heidari GhR, Keyghobadi M. (2020). Social responsibility in integrative corporate governance model in pursuit of the general policies of sustainable economic development. Quarterly Journal of the Macro and Strategic Policies, 8(2): 370-392. (In Persian)
Bagherinezhad Z, Abdullahi B, Hassanpour A, J’afarinia S. (2020). Designing a model for social responsibility human resource management in electric power industry. Scientific Journal of Research in Human Resources Management, 12(2): 147-187. (In Persian)
Bucur M, Moica S, Ardelean F, Otel CC. (2019). The importance of corporate social responsibility among organizations in the Centre development region of Romania. Procedia Manufacturing, 32: 309-317.
Chen X, Wan P, Sial MS. (2021). Institutional investors’ site visits and corporate social responsibility: Implications for the extractive industries. The Extractive Industries and Society, 8(1): 374-382.
Donnelly GE, Simester DI, Norton MI. (2021). The short and long-run impact of empowering customers in corporate social responsibility initiatives. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 192: 616-637.
Eghdampour R, Keshtiaray N, Esmaili R. (2020). Student's experiences of social responsibility in the university. Journal of Higher Education Curriculum, 10(20): 237-264. (In Persian)
Eghdampour R, Keshtiaray N, Esmaili R. (2018). Identifying factors affecting social responsibility of higher education ‎student's. Qualitative Research in Curriculum, 3(9): 139-169. (In Persian)
Erhemjamts O, Huang K. (2019). Institutional ownership horizon, corporate social responsibility and shareholder value. Journal of Business Research, 105: 61-79.
Ghasemnezhad Kh, Jazini A, Mohammadi Moghadam Y, Hendiani A. (2019). The pattern of social responsibility of organizations in social crime prevention. Police Management Studies Quarterly, 14(1): 9-32. (In Persian)
Ghorbani MJ, Faghihi A, Azizi Sh. (2020). An investigation of corporate social responsibility (CSR) model of oil refining companies via exploratory mix method. Organizational Culture Management, 18(1): 1-26. (In Persian)
Hasas Yeganeh Y, Blue Gh, Rezaei Sh. (2020). A model for impact of the selected dimensions of corporate social responsibility on avoidance and tax evasion. Journal of Financial Accounting Research. 11(4): 111-130. (In Persian)
Hirigoyen G. (2015). Relationships between corporate social responsibility and financial performance: What is the causality? Journal of Business & Management, Science and Education Centre of North America, 4(1): 18-43.
Khuong MN, Truogan NK, Hang TTT. (2021). Stakeholders and corporate social responsibility (CSR) programme as key sustainable development strategies to promote corporate reputation-evidence from Vietnam. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1): 1-8.
Lee JH, Byun HS, Park KS. (2018). Product market competition and corporate social responsibility activities: Perspectives from an emerging economy. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 49: 60-80.
Lee S, Han H, Radic A, Tariq B. (2020). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) as a customer satisfaction and retention strategy in the chain restaurant sector. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 45: 348-358.
Lee SY, Kim Y., Kim Y. (2021). Engaging consumers with corporate social responsibility campaigns: The roles of interactivity, psychological empowerment, and identification. Journal of Business Research, 134: 507-517.
Lin KZ, Cheng S, Zhang F. (2017). Corporate social responsibility, institutional environments, and tax avoidance: Evidence from a subnational comparison in China. The International Journal of Accounting, 52(4): 303-318.
Park E. (2019). Corporate social responsibility as a determinant of corporate reputation in the airline industry. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 47: 215-221.
Rezaeian A, Vedadi A, Rabiee Mendechin MR, Jafari Taheri H. (2020). Designing a model of social responsibility in the country's banking system. Journal of Monetary & Banking Research, 13(43): 25-68. (In Persian)
Seyedi S M R, Danaeifard H, Ganjali A, Khaef Elahi AA. (2019). Designing the competency model of senior government managers with the meta-combination method. Strategic Studies of Public Policy, 9(23): 78-54.
Tian Q, Liu Y, Fan J. (2015). The effects of external stakeholder pressure and ethical leadership on corporate social responsibility in China. Journal of Management & Organization, 21(4): 388-410.
Whait RB, Christ KL, Ortas E, Burritt RL. (2018). What do we know about tax aggressiveness and corporate social responsibility? An integrative review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 204: 542-552.
Wong AKF, Koseoglu MA, Kim S. (2021). The intellectual structure of corporate social responsibility research in tourism and hospitality: A citation/co-citation analysis. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 49: 270-284.
Xu B, Costa-Climent R, Wang Y, Xiao Y. (2020). Financial support for micro and small enterprises: Economic benefit or social responsibility? Journal of Business Research, 115: 266-271.
Zhang Q, Wang LFS. (2022). Corporate social responsibility, entry and optimal privatization in an international mixed market. International Review of Economics & Finance, 77: 14-24.
جامعه شناسی آموزش و پرورش
دوره 8، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 15
شهریور 1401
صفحه 207-217
فایل ها
سابقه مقاله
  • تاریخ دریافت: 26 مهر 1400
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 17 آذر 1400
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 23 اسفند 1400
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار: 23 فروردین 1401
اشتراک گذاری
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار