تعیین سبک رهبری مدیران ورزشی در نظام آموزش‌وپرورش مبتنی بر عوامل اقتضایی دبیران تربیت‌بدنی

هوشیار, منوچهر; سجادی هزاوه, سید حمید; حاجی انزهایی, زهرا

doi:10.22034/ijes.2021.700004

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

¹ گروه مدیریت ورزشی، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.

² گروه مدیریت ورزشی، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

10.22034/ijes.2021.700004

چکیده

هدف: سبک‌های رهبری نقش مهمی در کارآیی، عملکرد و اثربخشی سازمان دارند. بنابراین، هدف این پژوهش تعیین سبک رهبری مدیران ورزشی در نظام آموزش‌وپرورش مبتنی بر عوامل اقتضایی دبیران تربیت‌بدنی بود.
روش‌شناسی: مطالعه حاضر از نظر هدف کاربردی و از نظر شیوه اجرا همبستگی بود. جامعه پژوهش دبیران تربیت‌بدنی کشور در سال تحصیلی 98-1397 بودند. حجم نمونه بر اساس جدول کرجسی و مورگان 384 نفر برآورد که این تعداد با روش نمونه‌گیری خوشه‌ای چندمرحله‌ای انتخاب شدند. ابزارهای پژوهش پرسشنامه سبک رهبری (Likert, 1961)، پرسشنامه محقق‌ساخته عوامل اقتضایی دبیران تربیت‌بدنی (با دو بعد عوامل اقتضایی درون‌سازمانی و عوامل اقتضایی فردی)، پرسشنامه ویژگی‌های شخصیتی (Costa and McCrae, 1992) به‌عنوان عوامل اقتضایی شخصیتی و پرسشنامه متغیرهای فرهنگی (Hofstede, 1994) به‌عنوان عوامل اقتضایی فرهنگی- اجتماعی بودند. داده‌ها با روش‌های ضرایب همبستگی پیرسون و رگرسیون چندگانه با مدل همزمان در نرم‌افزار SPSS تحلیل شدند.
یافته‌ها: یافته‌ها نشان داد که فقط عوامل اقتضایی اجتناب از عدم اطمینان و مردسالاری توانایی پیش‌بینی سبک رهبری مستبدانه، فقط عوامل اقتضایی برونگرایی، سازگاری، اجتناب از عدم اطمینان و فاصله قدرت توانایی پیش‌بینی سبک رهبری خیرخواهانه، فقط عوامل اقتضایی روان‌رنجوری، سازگاری، اجتناب از عدم اطمینان و مردسالاری توانایی پیش‌بینی سبک رهبری مشورتی و فقط عوامل اقتضایی سازگاری، تمایل/ انگیزه کار، قابلیت/ توانایی و تیم کاری توانایی پیش‌بینی سبک رهبری مشارکتی را داشتند (05/0>P) و سایر عوامل اقتضایی نقش معناداری در پیش‌بینی هیچ‌یک از سبک‌های رهبری نداشتند (05/0P>).
نتیجه‌گیری: نتایج این مطالعه حاکی از نقش موثر برخی عوامل اقتضایی در پیش‌بینی سبک‌های رهبری مستبدانه، خیرخواهانه، مشورتی و مشارکتی بود که متخصصان می‌توانند از طریق تعدیل این عوامل باعث تغییر در سبک‌های رهبری شوند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Determining the Leadership Style of Sports Managers in the Education System based on the Contingent Factors of Physical Education Teachers

نویسندگان [English]

Manochehr Hoshiar ¹
Seyed Hamid Sajjadi Hazaveh ²
Zahra Haji anzehaei ²

¹ Sports Management Department, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

² Sports Management Department, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

Purpose: Leadership styles play an important role in the efficiency, performance and effectiveness of the organization. Therefore, the purpose of this research was determining the leadership style of sports managers in the education system based on the contingent factors of physical education teachers.
Methodology: The present study in terms of purpose was applied and in terms of implementation method was correlation. The research population was the physical education teachers of the country in the 2018-19 academic years. The sample size based on the Krejcie and Morgan table was estimated to be 384 people, who this number were selected by multi-stage cluster sampling method. The research tools were leadership style questionnaire (Likert, 1961), researcher-made questionnaire of physical education teachers' contingency factors (with two dimensions of intra-organizational contingency factors and individual contingency factors), personality characteristics questionnaire (Costa and McCrae, 1992) as personality contingency factors and cultural variables questionnaire (Hofstede, 1994) as cultural-social contingency factors. Data were analyzed by Pearson correlation coefficient multiple regression methods with enter model in SPSS software.
Findings: The findings showed that only the contingent factors of avoiding uncertainty and patriarchy had the ability to predict the authoritative leadership style, only the contingent factors of extroversion, agreeableness, avoiding uncertainty and power distance had the ability to predict the benevolent leadership style, only the contingent factors of neuroticism, agreeableness, avoiding uncertainty and patriarchy had the ability to predict the consultative leadership style and only the contingent factors of agreeableness, willingness/motivation of work, capability/ability and work team had the ability to predict the participative leadership style (P<0.05) and other contingent factors did not have a significant role in predicting any of the leadership styles (P>0.05).
Conclusion: The results of this study indicated the effective role of some contingent factors in predicting authoritative, benevolent, consultative and participative leadership styles, and experts can change leadership styles by adjusting these factors.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Keywords: Leadership style
sports managers
education system
contingent factors
physical education teachers

مراجع

Aschwanden D, Strickouser JE, Sesker AA, al. (2021). Psychological and behavioural responses to Coronavirus disease 2019: The role of personality. European Journal of Personality, 35(1): 51-66.

Banmairuroy W, Kritjaroen T, Homsombat W. (2022). The effect of knowledge-oriented leadership and human resource development on sustainable competitive advantage through organizational innovation's component factors: Evidence from Thailand ’s new S- curve industries. Asia Pacific Management Review, 27(3): 200-209.

Bazrafkan S, Ghaderi S. (2016). Improving organizational effectiveness in the light of internal contingency factors. Journal of Strategic Management Studies, 7(28): 191-210. (In Persian)

Bertsch A, Nguyen HTH, Alford A, et al. (2017). Exploring the relationship between personality and preferred leadership. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 14(1): 32-45.

Childs M, Turner T, Sneed C, Berry A. (2022). A contingency theory approach to understanding small retail business continuity during COVID-19. Family & Consumer Sciences, 50(3): 216-230.

Costa PT, McCrae RR. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO personality inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4(1): 5-13.

Drzewiecka M, Roczniewska M. (2018). The relationship between perceived leadership styles and organisational constraints: An empirical study in Goleman's typology. European Review of Applied Psychology, 68(4-5): 161-169.

Falamarzi H, Fathi Z, Shafiae H. (2022). Provide a model based on Hofstede's cultural framework for investors ' financial decision – making. Journal of Management and Auditing Knowledge, 10(40): 281-292. (In Persian)

Gatbabaei Lehe F, Tabrizi N, Sharepour M. (2022). Effect of Hofstede cultural dimensions on citizens' satisfaction with tourism activities (Case study: Babolsar city). Tourism Management Studies, 17(58): 9-38. (In Persian)

Ghanei R, Valiei S, Rezaei M, Rezaei K. (2013). The relationship between personality characteristics and Nursing occupational stress. Iranian Journal of Psychiatric Nursing, 1(3): 27-34. (In Persian)

Hajkhozeymeh M, Ebrahimi S, Hoseini Jebeli VS. (2018). Relationship between organizational culture of univercity based on Hofstede dimensions and teachers leadership style. Journal of Development Evolution Management, 1397(Special Issue): 199-207. (In Persian)

Hasas Yeganeh Y, Babajani J, BArzideh F, Beiglar K. (2017). Effective contingent factors on negotiation to resolve the auditor's disagreements with the employer in connection with the way of financial reporting. Journal of Audit Science, 17(67): 5-23. (In Persian)

Hofstede G. (1994). Management scientists are human. Management Science, 40(1): 4-13.

Hofstede G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture: International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 2(1): 1-26.

Huertas-Valdivia I, Gallego-Burin AR, Llorens-Montes FJ. (2019). Effects of different leadership styles on hospitality workers. Tourism Management, 71: 402-420.

Kiplangat HK. (2017). The relationship between leadership styles and lecturers' job satisfaction in institutions of higher learning in Kenya. Universal Journal of Educational Research 5(3): 435-446.

Lau AKW. (2014). Influence of contingent factors on the perceived level of supplier integration: A contingency perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 33: 210-242.

Lee YS, Liu WK. (2012). Leadership behaviors and culture dimensions in the financial industry. Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, 2(2): 15-44.

Likert R (1961). New patterns of management. New York: McGraw- Hill.

Luu TT. (2020). Linking authentic leadership to salespeople's service performance: The roles of job crafting and human resource flexibility. Industrial Marketing Management, 84: 89-104.

Mosalanejad R, Naderian Jahromi M, Afrouzeh MS, Dast Barhagh H. (2021). Presenting a model of contingent factors influencing quality management development in sport organizations (Case study of FARS). Journal of Management and Organizational Behavior in Sports, 10(2): 79-92. (In Persian)

Mousavi SM, Moradi S, Sharifian L. (2022). Identifying the dimensions and components of transformational leadership style in the educational managers of Islamic Azad University. Journal of Islamic Life Style Centered on Health, 5(4): 303-312. (In Persian)

Pan TP, Trakulmututa J, Youravong N. (2020). Self-perception of leadership style of dentists: heads of dental departments in community hospitals, Southern Thailand. International Dental Journal, 70(3): 193-200.

Rapp C, Ingold K, Freitag M. (2019). Personalized networks? How the Big Five personality traits influence the structure of egocentric networks. Social Science Research, 77: 148-160.

Schoefer K, Wappling A, Heirati N, Blut M. (2019). The moderating effect of cultural value orientations on behavioral responses to dissatisfactory service experiences. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 48: 247-256.

Shala B, Prebreza A, Ramosaj B. (2021). The contingency theory of management as a factor of acknowledging the leaders-managers of our time study case: The practice of the contingency theory in the company Avrios. Open Access Library Journal, 8: 1-20.

Steyn R. (2020). Leadership styles and organizational structure. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 10(3): 98-116.

Stremersch S, Camacho N, Keko E, Wuyts S. (2022). Grassroots innovation success: The role of self-determination and leadership style. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 39(2): 396-414.

Sucupira E, De Brito MJA, Leite AT, et al. (2022). Body dysmorphic disorder and personality in breast augmentation: The big-five personality traits and BDD symptoms. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 75(9): 3101-3107.

Tafazzoli R, Hoseini MS. (2017). The relationship between managers leadership style with using information technology in school of Bandar Jask. Quarterly Research on Educational Leadership and Management, 3(12): 149-173. (In Persian)

Xie Y, Xue W, Li L, et al. (2018). Leadership style and innovation atmosphere in enterprises: An empirical study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 135: 257-265.

Zabihi Kharagh AR, Kaffashpoor A, Farahi MM, Rahimnia F. (2018). Exploring contingency factors of strategic human resource management and identify effective practices of human resource. Public Management Research, 10(38): 89-116. (In Persian)

Yarmohammadzadeh P, Faizy A, Mohamadian K, Agh Atabay A. (2017). Investigating the relationship among university teachersʼ personality traits, classroom leadership style, and efficacy through self-evaluation: Providing a structural model. Journal of Instruction and Evaluation, 10(39): 29-51. (In Persian

جامعه شناسی آموزش و پرورش

تعیین سبک رهبری مدیران ورزشی در نظام آموزش‌وپرورش مبتنی بر عوامل اقتضایی دبیران تربیت‌بدنی

مراجع

مراجع

دوره 7، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 14
اسفند 1400
صفحه 380-394

تعیین سبک رهبری مدیران ورزشی در نظام آموزش‌وپرورش مبتنی بر عوامل اقتضایی دبیران تربیت‌بدنی

مراجع

مراجع

دوره 7، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 14اسفند 1400صفحه 380-394

دوره 7، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 14
اسفند 1400
صفحه 380-394