جامعه شناسی آموزش و پرورش

دو فصلنامه علمی جامعه شناسی آموزش و پرورش

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

اخبار و اعلانات

ارزیابی نشریه

شناسایی شاخص‌های روانشناختی مدارس ایمن

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار، گروه روان شناسی، واحد تهران جنوب، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

2 دانشیار، گروه روان شناسی تربیتی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران

3 استاد، دانشگاه پوآتیه، فرانسه

10.22034/ijes.2022.544212.1208

چکیده

هدف: مدارس ایمن می­توانند با ایجاد فضای امن و شناخت مناسب دانش‌آموزان و نیازهای روان‌شناختی آنها، فرآیند اجتماعی شدن و جامعه‌پذیری آنها را تسهیل کنند. بنابراین پژوهش حاضر با هدف شناسایی شاخص­های روانشناختی مدارس ایمن انجام شد.
روش­شناسی: مطالعة حاضر از نظر هدف، کاربردی و از نظر روش اجرا، کیفی بود. جامعة پژوهش اسناد و متون چاپی موجود در پایگاه­های اطلاعات علمی مرتبط با موضوع شاخص­های روانشناختی مدارس ایمن بین سال­های 2020-2000 میلادی بودند، که 18 مطالعه با استفاده از روش نمونه­گیری هدفمند به عنوان نمونه انتخاب شدند. داده­ها، به روش فیش­برداری گردآوری شدند و  با استفاده از روش تحلیل مضمون در نرم­افزار MAXQDA نسخة 12 مورد تحلیل قرار گرفتند.
یافته ­ها: یافته ­ها نشان داد که برای مدارس ایمن، 298 کد باز و 36 کد محوری در قالب 7 کد انتخابی شناسایی شد. که شاملِ برنامه­ریزی و آموزش برای مواجهه در موقعیت بحرانی و اضطراری (4 کد محوری)، ایجاد تعادل بین امنیت فیزیکی و روانشناختی (6 کد محوری)، ایجاد همکاری درون­سازمانی و برون­سازمانی (3 کد محوری)، ارائة خدمات روانشناختی کافی و مناسب (8 کد محوری)، بهبود دسترسی به حمایت­های بهداشت روانی مبتنی بر مدرسه (5 کد محوری)، خدمات پیشگیری و مداخلات زودهنگام (4 کد محوری) و توانمندسازی معلمان و کادر مدرسه (6 کد محوری) بودند و در نهایت الگوی شاخص­های روانشناختی مدارس ایمن طراحی شد.
بحث و نتیجه­گیری: براساس کدهای شناسایی شده، می­توان ایمنی روانشناختی مدارس را مورد ارزیابی قرار داد و بعد از برگزاری نشست­ها و هم­اندیشی­های کارشناسانه میزان تحقق این شاخص­ها را در مدارس بررسی و  مدنظر قرار داد

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Identifying the Psychological Indicators of Safe Schools

نویسندگان [English]

  • Afsaneh Lotfi Azimi 1
  • Soghra Ebrahimiqavam 2
  • Nematollah Jaafari 3

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, South Tehran Branch. Islamic Azad University. Tehran. Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Educational Psychology. Allameh Tabataba’i University,, Tehran. Iran

3 Professor of Université de Poitiers | UP • Psychiatry, France.

چکیده [English]

Purpose: Safe schools can facilitate the process of socialization and sociability by creating a safe environment and appropriate recognition of students and their psychological needs, so the present study was conducted to identify the psychological indicators of safe schools.
Methodology: The present study was applied in terms of purpose and qualitative in terms of implementation method. The research corpus consisted of documents and printed texts in scientific databases related to the subject of psychological indicators of safe schools between 2000 and 2020. From among the documents and considering the criteria, 18 studies were selected as the sample using purposive sampling method. Data were collected by phishing method and analyzed using content analysis method in MAXQDA software version 12.
Findings: In relation to the psychological safety of safe schools, 298 open codes and 36 pivotal codes were identified in the form of 7 selected codes, which include, planning and training for dealing with critical and emergency situations (4 pivotal codes), creating a balance between physical and psychological security (6 central codes), establishing internal and external cooperation (3 central codes), providing adequate and appropriate psychological services with 8 central codes, improving access to school-based mental health support (5 central codes), prevention services and early interventions (4 central codes) and empowerment of teachers and school staff (6 central codes). Finally, the model of psychological indicators of safe schools was designed.
Conclusion: Based on the identified codes, the psychological safety of schools can be evaluated and after holding meetings and expert discussions, the extent of realization of these indicators in schools can be considered

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Psychological Indicators
  • Safe Schools
  • Early Interventions
  • Psychological Services
مراجع
Ahn J, Lee BJ, Kahng SK, et al. (2017). Estimating the prevalence rate of child physical and psychological maltreatment in South Korea. Child indicators research, 10(1): 187-203.‏
 Asmaniati F & Pantja Djati S & Ingkadijaya R. (2021). Analysis of Disaster Safe School Level in West Coast of Pandeglang Regency, Indonesia. Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, 20(1): 961-969.
Baeva IA, Bazhenova MD, Bannikov GS, et al. (2018). Psychological Safety of School Environment and  Adolescens Attitude to life. Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the organizing committee of the conference eISSN: 2357-1330: 75-82.
Baeva IA, Bordovskaia NV. (2015). The psychological safety of the educational environment and the psychological well-being of russian secondary school pupils and teachers. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 8(1): 86-99.‏
Barlow DH,  Allen LB, Choate ML. (2016). Toward a unified treatment for emotional disorders-republished Article. Behavior therapy, 47: 838-53.
Bonny AE, Britto MT, Kolstermann BK, et al. (2000). School connectedness: identifying adolescents at risk. Pediatrics; 106(5):1017-21.
Cowan KC, Vaillancourt K, Rossen, E, Pollitt, K. (2013). A framework for safe and successful schools [Brief]. Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
Gadin K, Hammarstom A. (2003). Do changes in the psychosocial school environment influence pupils’ health development? Results from a three-year follow-up study. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health; 31(5): 169-177.
Gangi TA. (2010). School climate and faculty relationships: Choosing an effective assessment measure. St. John’s University, New York.
Garmezy N, Masten AS, Tellegen A. (2019). The study  of  stress  and  competence in children:  building    blocks  for   developmental   psychopathology. Children  Development. 55: 97- 111.
Gioiosa M, Kinkela K. (2019). Classroom exercises with technology and communication skills: students’ perceptions.Journal of International Education in Business. 12(1): 2-13.
Gottfredson GD, Gottfredson DC, Payne AA & Gottfredson NC. (2005). School climate predictors of school disorder: Results from a national study of delinquency prevention in schools. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 42 (3): 412–444.
Han G. (2018). Determining the correlation between quality of life and self-concept in children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 21(7): 601-608.
Havlinova M, Schneidrova D. (1995). Stress characteristics in schoolchildren related to different educational strategies and school climates. Central European Journal of Public Health; 3(4):205-9.
James B. (2020). Restorative Justice Liability: School Discipline Reform and Right to Safe Schools. University of Memphis Law Review, Forthcoming, Pepperdine University Legal Studies Research Paper, 9(3): 51-67. 22.
Kvale S. (1996). Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks: sage.
Leki Z, Goldost Joibari  RA. (2015). Family-oriented measures in preventing juvenile delinquency. International Conference on Research in Science and Technology. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Lorenzo‐Blanco EI,  Meca A, Piña‐Watson B, et al. (2019). Longitudinal trajectories of family functioning among recent immigrant adolescents and parents: Links with adolescent and parent cultural stress, emotional well‐being, and behavioral health. Child development, 90(2): 506-523.
MacIntosh JI. (1991). Dimensions and determinants of school social climate in schools enrolling middle year students. SSTA Research Centre Report #91-04. Saskatchewan, Canada.
Madrid BJ, Lopez GD, Dans LF, et al. (2020). Safe schools for teens: preventing sexual abuse of urban poor teens, proof-of-concept study - Improving teachers' and students’ knowledge, skills and attitudes. journal Heliyon, 6(2): 1-12.
Masten AS. (2018). Adult resilience after child abuse. Nature human behaviour, 2(4): 244-245.
Nardelli GG, Gaudenci EM, Silveira RED, et al. (2019). Knowledge about HIV/AIDS in older adults using the services of Family Health Strategy. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, 52.
Nopembri S, Maryana ST, Saryono M, Purnama DS. (2021). Constructing Student’s Physical Preparedness through GameBased Activities in Disaster-Safe School. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science e012024, 1-7.
Nutbeam D, Smith CL, Bauman A. (1993). Warning! schools can damage your health: alienation from school and its impact on health behaviour. Journal of Paediatric Child Health; 29(1): 25-35.
Patton GC, Glover S, Bond L, et al. (2000). The Gatehouse Project: A systematic approach to mental health promotion in secondary schools. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry; 34(4):586-93.   
Randall PW. (2019). Teacher stress in rural schools: A phenomenological study on stress and its effect on teacher-perceived physical and mental well-being. Order, 17 (3): 78-91.
Roche MK, Strobach KV. (2019). Nine elements of effective school community partnerships to address student mental health, Physical Health, and Overall Wellness. Coalition for Community Schools. 9 (6): 28-41.
Schonert-Rechel KA, Hymel A. (2015). Educating the hearts well aS the mind: Social and emotional learning for school and Life success. Centre for social and emotional education  Journal, 8(1): 84- 93.
 Servoss TJ. (2018). School Security, Perception of Safety, and Student Misbehavior: a Multi-level Examination. Ph.D dissertation, The University at Buffalo, State University of New York.
Sexton TL. (2017). Functional family therapy. The Encyclopedia of Juvenile Delinquency and Justice, 1-7.
Shevlin A, Gill PR. (2020). Parental attitudes to the Australian antibullying Safe Schools program: a critical discourse analysis. Social Psychology of Education, 23(4): 891-915.
Shevlin, A, Gill PR. (2020). Parental attitudes to the Australian anti‑bullying Safe Schools program: a critical discourse analysis. Social Psychology of Education, Social Psychology of Education: An International Journal, 23(4), 891-915.
Soleimanpour S, Geierstanger S, Brindis CD. (2017). Adverse childhood experiences and resilience: addressing the unique needs of adolescents. Academic pediatrics, 17(7): S108-S114.
Stewart EA. (2003). School social bonds, school climate, and school misbehavior: A multilevel analysis. Justice Quarterly, 20 (18): 575–604.
Terrell JH, Henrich CC, Nabors A, et al. (2020). Conceptualizing and measuring safe and supportive schools. Contemporary school psychology, 24(3): 327-336.‏
Turner S, Harder N. (2018). Psychological safe environment: A concept analysis. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 18 (12): 47-55.
Tye-Murray N. (2019). Foundations of aural rehabilitation: Children, adults, and their family members. Plural Publishing.‏
World Health Organization. (‎2003)‎. Creating an environment for emotional and social well-being: an important responsibility of a health promoting and child-friendly school. World Health Organization.
جامعه شناسی آموزش و پرورش
دوره 8، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 2
اسفند 1401
صفحه 67-78
فایل ها
سابقه مقاله
  • تاریخ دریافت: 13 آذر 1400
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 21 اسفند 1400
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 27 اردیبهشت 1401
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار: 27 اردیبهشت 1401
اشتراک گذاری
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار