دو فصلنامه علمی جامعه شناسی آموزش و پرورش

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی (کمی)

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مدیریت آموزشی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد گرمسار، گرمسار، ایران

2 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت آموزشی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد گرمسار، گرمسار، ایران

3 دانشیار گروه مدیریت آموزشی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد گرمسار، گرمسار، ایران

10.22034/ijes.2021.533647.1108

چکیده

هدف: مسئولیت اجتماعی در مدارس نقش موثری در عملکرد و موفقیت مدارس دارد. بنابراین،‌ پژوهش حاضر با هدف طراحی و ارائه الگوی مسئولیت اجتماعی مدارس انجام شد.
روش‌شناسی: این مطالعه از نظر هدف کاربردی و از نظر شیوه اجرا کیفی مبتنی بر نظریه اشتراوس و کوربین (1998) بود. جامعه پژوهش خبرگان مسئولیت اجتماعی مدارس کشور ایران در سال 1399 بودند. حجم نمونه طبق اصل اشباع نظری 15 نفر برآورد که با روش نمونه‌گیری گلوله‌برفی انتخاب شدند. داده‌ها با مصاحبه نیمه‌ساختاریافته جمع‌آوری و با روش کدگذاری باز، محوری و انتخابی در نرم‌افزار MAXQDA-12 تحلیل شدند.
یافته‌ها: یافته‌ها نشان داد که مسئولیت اجتماعی مدارس دارای 98 مفهوم و 28 مقوله فرعی در 8 مقوله اصلی شامل مسئولیت‌های قانونی و مسئولیت‌های اخلاقی (شرایط علی)، مسئولیت‌های عمومی و بشردوستانه (پدیده محوری)، مسئولیت‌های اجتماعی و سیاسی (شرایط مداخله‌گر)، مسئولیت‌های اقتصادی (شرایط زمینه‌ای)، مسئولیت‌های زیست محیطی و دانش‌افزایی ذینفعان (راهبردها) و آگاهی و همکاری (پیامدها) بود.
بحث و نتیجه‌گیری: بر اساس یافته ها الگوی پژوهش حاضر می‌تواند یک راهنما برای متخصصان و برنامه‌ریزان باشد و آنان بر اساس آن برنامه‌هایی جهت ارزیابی و بهبود مسئولیت اجتماعی مدارس طراحی و اجرا نمایند.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Designing and Presenting the Schools Social Responsibility Model

نویسندگان [English]

  • Seyede Tayebeh Tabai 1
  • Hamid Shafizadeh 2
  • Nader Soleimani 3

1 PhD Student, Department of Educational Management, Islamic Azad University, Garmsar Branch, Garmsar, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Educational Management, Islamic Azad University, Garmsar Branch, Garmsar, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Department of Educational Management, Islamic Azad University, Garmsar Branch, Garmsar, Iran

چکیده [English]

Purpose: Today, organizational socialization is very important for individuals and organizations. Because on the one hand, if it is neglected or ignored, the probability of occurrence and repetition of behaviors outside the framework and organizational norms will increase, and the continuation of this situation will lead to the formation of negative attitudes and behaviors, conflicts, conflicts, displacement and leaving the job, and on the other hand, the cost of selection And it increases the recruitment of efficient and practical forces for the organization. One of the main concerns of efficient managers at different levels of the organization is how to create suitable platforms for human factors to fulfill their job duties and ethical principles with a sense of responsibility and full commitment, which is one of the factors affecting it, is social responsibility. One of the indicators of citizenship behavior in all organizations, including educational organizations, is acceptance of responsibility, and responsibility is a social process through which people consider themselves a part of the organization and their job, and they tend to always see their organization as successful. Responsibility means valuing the interdependent relationships that exist between the organization, the interest groups, the economic system and related communities, and social responsibility is a tool for the obligations that an organization must have towards its society, a way for policy ideas about the implementation of obligations. And it is a tool to meet the needs of both organization and society. Social responsibility is a social obligation to apply policies in organizational decisions and perform actions and activities related to the values ​​accepted by society. Social responsibility in schools plays an important role in the schools performance and success. As a result, the present study was conducted with the aim of designing and presenting the schools social responsibility model.
Methodology: This study in terms of purpose was applied and in terms of implementation method was qualitative based on the theory of Strauss and Corbin (1998). The research population was schools social responsibility experts of Iran country in 2020 year. The sample size according to the theoretical saturation principle was estimated 15 people who were selected by snowball sampling method. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed by open, axial and selective coding method in MAXQDA-12 software.
Findings: Findings showed that social responsibility of schools has 98 concepts and 28 sub-categories in 8 main categories including legal responsibilities and moral responsibilities (causal conditions), public and humanitarian responsibilities (central phenomenon), social and political responsibilities (intervening conditions), economic responsibilities (Contextual conditions), environmental responsibilities and stakeholder awareness (strategies) and awareness and cooperation (consequences).
Conclusion: Based on the findings, the current research model can be a guide for specialists and planners and they can design and implement programs based on it to evaluate and improve the social responsibility of schools.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Social responsibility
  • Schools
  • Awareness
  • Cooperation
Augustiniene A, Jociene J, Minkute-Henrickson R. (2015). Social responsibility of a Comprehensive school: Theoretical insights of its modeling. International Journal on Global Business Management & Research, 3(2): 23-41.
Baradaran Haghir M, Noorshahi N, Roshan AR. (2019). The conceptualization of social responsibility of the university in Iran. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 25(3): 1-26. (In Persian)
Bugdayci S. (2019). Examining personal and social responsibility levels of secondary school students. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(1), 206-210.
Burgos J, Carnero C. (2020). Assessment of social responsibility in education in secondary schools. Journal of Sustainability, 12(4849): 1-38.
Chaisa P, Chinokul S. (2021). Effects of reading instruction using backward design framework and citizenship theme to enhance English reading comprehension and social responsibility of tenth-grade Thai EFL students. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 14(1): 176-207.
Cheng WY, Cheung RYM, Chung KKH. (2021). Understanding adolescents’ perceived social responsibility: The role of family cohesion, interdependent self-construal, and social trust. Journal of Adolescence, 89: 55-62.
Eghdampour R, Keshtiaray N, Esmaili R. (2020). Student's experiences of social responsibility in the university. Journal of Higher Education Curriculum, 10(20): 237-264. (In Persian)
Eghdampour R, Keshtiaray N, Esmaili R. (2018). Identifying factors affecting social responsibility of higher education ‎student's. Qualitative Research in Curriculum, 3(9): 139-169. (In Persian)
Hirigoyen G. (2015). Relationships between corporate social responsibility and financial performance: What is the causality? Journal of Business & Management, Science and Education Centre of North America, 4(1): 18-43.
Huang Y, Do M. (2021). Review of empirical research on university social responsibility. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(3): 549-563.
Khuong MN, Truogan NK, Hang TTT. (2021). Stakeholders and corporate social responsibility (CSR) programme as key sustainable development strategies to promote corporate reputation—evidence from Vietnam. Cognt Business & Management, 8(1): 1-8.
Madhoushi M, Norouzi A. (2015). The explanation of promotion template for corporate social responsibility. Journal of Strategic Management Studies, 6(23): 43-60. (In Persian)
Malinauskas RK, Juodsnukis DR. (2017). Education of social responsibility among sports schools students. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 6(2): 289-296.
Moradi Kordkandi Z. (2020). Relationship between organizational socialization and social responsibility of high school teachers in Shahin Dej city. Journal of Research Ourmaze, 49: 61-77. (In Persian)
Okechukwu Ugwuozor F, Otu MS. (2020). Effect of exposure to business ethics courses on students' perceptions of the linkage between ethics education and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Education for Business, 95(4): 242-247.
Poodineh M, Hosseingholizadeh R, Mahram B. (2018). Social responsibility of school: A case study of two girls' middle schools in Mashhad city. Journal of New Educational Approaches, 13(2): 95-120. (In Persian)
Salehi Motaahed Z, Bakhtari H, Seyedin ZS. (2020). Exploring the components of social Responsibility in Primary School Social Science Textbooks Based on the Teachings of Nahj al-Balagha1. Biannual Journal of Islamic Perspective on Educational Science, 8(15): 165-189. (In Persian)
Saracaloglu AS, Gerceker CS. (2018). Relationship between individual social responsibilities and personal values of teacher candidates. International Education Studies, 11(10), 64-77.
Shahini HA. (2011). Social responsibility promotion alternatives among staff managers of Islamic Azad University Central organization. Journal of Cultural Management, 5(4): 116-123. (In Persian)
Tian Q, Liu Y, Fan J. (2015). The effects of external stakeholder pressure and ethical leadership on corporate social responsibility in China. Journal of Management & Organization, 21(4): 388-410.
Yazdanpanah L, Hekmat F. (2014). Study of effective factors on social responsibility between students of Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman. Journal of Iranian Social Studies, 8(2): 128-152. (In Persian)