Document Type : Research Article (Quantitative)

Authors

1 PhD in Higher Education Development Planning, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

2 Professor, Department of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

4 Associate Professor, Department of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Al-Zahra University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to identify the existing educational and research inequities against students during university study.
Methodology: This study is applied research in terms of purpose and descriptive in terms of implementation method. Therefore, a qualitative phenomenological approach was used. The population of the study was students of a comprehensive public university in Tehran in the academic year 2019-2020. Twenty students were selected according to the principle of theoretical saturation by purposive and standard sampling. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews. The content validity of the interview tool was confirmed by experts and its reliability was confirmed by the inter-coder reliability method with a coefficient of 78%. Also, Van Kaam’s analysis method was used for data analysis.
Findings: The findings showed that educational inequities had eight main themes and 45 sub-themes and research inequities had five main themes and 21 sub-themes. The main themes of educational inequities were teachers' weakness in teaching, lack of seriousness in teaching and learning, low criticism of teachers, unruly student evaluation, undermining student motivation, humiliation of students, non-recognition of student diversity, and limited access to professors. In the field of research, the main themes of inequity were discrimination in doctoral admissibility, restrictions on cooperation with professors, weakness and discrimination in providing scientific guidance, instrumental view to the student, and problems in obtaining the resources needed for research. These inequities are factors that negatively affect the development and strengthening of students' core capabilities, namely respect and dignity; knowledge and imagination; emotional integrity; learning disposition; voice; aspiration; practical reasoning; and relationships and social networks.
Conclusion: Workshops for professors on the subject of educational and research equity, increasing the diversity of professors and the educational content in accordance with the differences of students, paying attention to students' opinions on various university issues, and addressing their objections, are some of the strategies to address existing inequities.

Keywords

Abbas Zadeh S. (2015). Comparative study of the country’s five development plans regarding gender justice: with emphasis on Iran women higher education and comparing that with universal criteria. Women’s Studies, 6(11): 97–130.
Adib Y, Fathi-Azar E, Moulaqalqachi S. (2015). A study of the experiences of Tabriz University’s teachers and students about attention to research ethics: a phenomenological study. Culture Strategy Quarterly, 8(29): 149-178.
Bazargan A. (1995). Equality of oportunities in higher education: An image from the University of Tehran. Journal of Psychology and Educational Sciences, 1(4): 58–72.
Chiappero-Martinetti E, Sabadash A. (2014). The Capability Approach. Springer.
Dalkilic M, Vadeboncoeur J A. (2016). Re-framing inclusive education through the capability approach: An elaboration of the model of relational inclusion. Global Education Review, 3(3): 122–137.
Dar L. (2014). Toward a better understanding of equity in higher education finance and policy. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, 29: 535–571.
Dehnavi H A. (2005). An evaluation of family backgrounds of higher education applicants in 1982. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 10(4): 93–124.
Dei G J S. (2008). Indigenous knowledge studies and the next generation: Pedagogical possibilites for anti-colonial education. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 37(S1): 5–13.
 Eskandari Z. (2016). Inequality and higher education: unequal opportunities and scientific activism. Master Thesis, Al-Zahra University.
Espinoza O. (2008). Creating (in) equalities in access to higher education in the context of structural adjustment and post-adjustment policies: the case of chile. Higher Education, 55(3): 269–284.
Fereidouni  S, Rouhani S. (2019). Higher education expansion policy in Iran and its impact on educational justice. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 25(2): 1–21.
Flick U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research. sage.
Gale T, Molla T. (2015). Social justice intents in policy : an analysis of capability for and through education. Journal of Education Policy, 30(6): 810–830.
Gale T, Parker S. (2014). Navigating change: A typology of student transition in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 39(5): 734–753.
Gall M. D, Borg W R, Gall J P. (1996). Educational research: An introduction. Longman Publishing.
Gharun M. (2004). Effects of family socio – economic status on demands for higher education. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 9(4): 43–74.
Gharun M. (2006). The examination and estimation of the effects of family socio – economic characteristics on demand for higher education. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 12(2): 91–109.
Giani M. S. (2016). Are all colleges equally equalizing? how institutional selectivity impacts socioeconomic disparities in graduates’ labor outcomes. The Review of Higher Education, 39(3): 431–461.
Hatakka M, Lagsten J. (2012). The capability approach as a tool for development evaluation - analyzing students’ use of internet resources. Information Thechnology for Development, 18(1, SI): 23–41.
Heidarzadeh A, Dehghan M, Shahmohamadipour P, et al. (2017). Relationship between educational equity, academic burnout and achievement among students at Kerman University of Medical Science. Educational Development of Judishapur, 7(4): 298–306.
Jacobs L. A. (2013). Fairness in Access to Higher Education in a Global Perspective. Springer.
Jamali E. (2010). The impact of socioeconomic status on the academic performance of students entering higher education in Iran. Iranian Higher Education, 3(10): 25–54.
Jerrim J, Macmillan L. (2015). Income inequality, intergenerational mobility, and the Great Gatsby curve: Is education the key? Social Forces, 94(2): 505–533.
Lihamba A, Mwaipopo R, Shule L. (2006). The challenges of affirmative action in Tanzanian higher education institutions: A case study of the University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. In Women’s Studies International Forum, (29): 581–591.
Lips A J A. (2011). A typology of institutional loan replacement grant initiatives for low- and moderate-income students. The Review of Higher Education, 34(4): 611–655.
Loots S,  Walker M. (2015). Shaping a gender equality policy in higher education: which human capabilities matter? Gender and Education, 27(4): 361–375.
Lord J E, Stein M A. (2018). Pursuing inclusive higher education in Egypt and beyond through the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Social Inclusion, 6(4): 230–240.
Mahdi M, YD Sorkhabi M, Rezaeizadeh M, Monadi M. (2020). The capability approach and equity in higher education: A meta-synthesis of students capabilities, IRPHE, 26(1): 1–22.
Mahlangu V P. (2020). Rethinking student admission and access in higher education through the lens of capabilities approach. International Journal of Educational Management.
Marzooghi R, Heidari M, Heidari E. (2013). The impact of educational justice on students’ academic burnout in the University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Science Tehran Iran. Strides in Development of Medical Education, 10(3): 328–334.
McCowan T. (2007). Expansion without equity: An analysis of current policy on access to higher education in Brazil. Higher Education, 53(5): 579–598.
McDonough P M, Fann A. J. (2007). The study of inequality. Sociology of Higher Education: Contributions and Their Contexts, 53–93.
Molla T. (2013). Higher education policy reform in Ethiopia: The representation of the problem of gender inequality. Higher Education Policy, 26(2): 193–215
Morley L. (2006). Hidden transcripts: The micropolitics of gender in Commonwealth universities. In Women’s Studies International Forum.(29): 543–551.
Morley L. (2012). As the world turns: Implications of global shifts in higher education for theory, research and practice. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Mosia P A, Phasha N. (2017). Access to curriculum for students with disabilities at higher education institutions: How does the National University of Lesotho fare? African Journal Of Disability, 6(1): 1-13.
Moustakas C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage.
Mutanga O, Walker M. (2015). Towards a disability-inclusive higher education policy through the capabilities approach. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 16(4): 501–517.
Noghani M. (2007). The impact of cultural capital inequality on the academic achievement of pre-university students in achieving higher education. Quarterly Journal of Education, 23(3): 71-102.
Okkolin M.-A, Koskela T, Engelbrecht P, Savolainen H. (2018). Capability to be educated—inspiring and inclusive pedagogical arrangements from Finnish schools. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 19(4): 421–437.
Omran I. S, Hajitabar M, Shafai A B. (2018). The relationship of educational justice with educational exhaustion in Mazandaran University students. Quarterly Research on Educational Leadership & Management, 4(16): 97–124.
Roshan A H. (2008). Distribution of admission opportunities to Iranian public universities. Social Welfare Quarterly, 8(30): 285–312.
Rueda R Z, Murallas-Sánchez D, Ortega-Zambrano C. (2021). Inclusive education and labour insertion from a capabilities approach: a phenomenological and functional diversity perspective. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 39(1): 265–282.
Teichler U. (2014). Higher education and the future social order: equality of opportunity, quality, competitiveness? The Future of the Post-Massified University at the Crossroads, Springer.
Testa D, Egan R. (2014). Finding voice: the higher education experiences of students from diverse backgrounds. Teaching In Higher Education, 19(3): 229–241.
UNESCO. (2017). A guide for ensuring inclusion and equity in education. UNESCO Paris.
Van Kaam A. (1966). Application of the phenomenological method. A. van Kaam, Existential Foundations of Psychology. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Vlachou A, Papananou I. (2018). Experiences and perspectives of Greek higher education students with disabilities. Educational Research, 60(2): 206–221.
Walker M. (2006). Higher education pedagogies: A capabilities approach. Open University Press and McGraw-Hill.
Walker M. (2019). The achievement of university access: conversion factors, capabilities and choices. Social Inclusion, 7(1): 52
Wells R, Cuenca R, Ramirez G B, Aragón J. (2018). Geographic mobility and social inequality among Peruvian university students. Higher Education, 75(3): 449–469.
Wilson-Strydom M, Walker M. (2015). A capabilities-friendly conceptualisation of flourishing in and through education. Journal of Moral Education, 44(3): 310–324.