Neda Mohseni; Mohammadali Hoseini; Nadergholi Ghorchiyan
Abstract
Purpose: In educational systems, educational and behavioral issues are important categories whose radius of conflict and influence go beyond the framework of formal education and cover the whole life. In this direction and in the field of behavioral issues, there are lifelong approaches that can be considered ...
Read More
Purpose: In educational systems, educational and behavioral issues are important categories whose radius of conflict and influence go beyond the framework of formal education and cover the whole life. In this direction and in the field of behavioral issues, there are lifelong approaches that can be considered and investigated, which should not be hidden or sidelined by the authorities. One of these approaches is home-school interaction. According to the opinion of researchers, the first step of the education process is to establish a relationship. And the final step is to ensure the reliability of relationships and communications. Effective and strong communication between home and school and increasing parental participation is considered essential, and one of the consequences of improving the qualitative and quantitative level of school interaction is the prevention of social misbehavior of students (especially teenagers). Misbehaviors and communication-social challenges can affect social relationships in verbal and non-verbal interactions, play, understanding the goals and intentions of others, emotion regulation, learning skills and other dimensions and fuel wide behavioral problems. The aim of this study was to identify the factors that promote school-family interaction in the prevention of adolescent social abuse.Methodology: The methodology of qualitative research was based on data theory (grounded theory) and content analysis of books and related articles.The statistical population consisted of 10 specialists who did research in the field of educational management and were experts, thinkers and professors in the field of educational management and educational sciences at the university, and were interviewed. The sampling method was purposive. Qualitative data analysis was performed using a coding process based on the systematic design of the data theory strategy of the Corbin and Strauss Foundation (2008). According to this plan, the required data were collected and counted by open coding, axial coding, selective coding of categories, and subcategories. The analysis software was MAXQDA 2018.Findings: After reviewing and matching these codes and removing duplicate codes, common codes were determined and categories were reviewed with the background and theoretical foundations of matching and common concepts. After performing the open coding operation, in the axial coding stage, common and similar concepts (codes) were semantically determined and classified. Finally, the model of promoting school-family interaction in the prevention of adolescent social abuse was validated by experts.Conclusion: The model includes causal conditions: structural factor and cultural factor Strategies: expanding the possibility of parental involvement, expanding professional ethics, setting rules and regulations and creating a culture of consequences: social factors, educational factors; Background: Students' experiences, managerial deficiencies, family educational role and intervention conditions include: Lack of cooperation with the family with educators, lack of family financial resources, lack of specialized staff. K
Psychology
Saaed Abbaspour Esfeden; Hossien Sahebdel; Majid Ebrahimpour
Abstract
Purpose: Academic self-handicapping plays an important role in other academic variables. Therefore, the aim of this study was to comparing the effectiveness of motivational psychotherapy and cognitive behavioral therapy on academic self-handicapping in adolescents.Methodology: This study was a semi-experimental ...
Read More
Purpose: Academic self-handicapping plays an important role in other academic variables. Therefore, the aim of this study was to comparing the effectiveness of motivational psychotherapy and cognitive behavioral therapy on academic self-handicapping in adolescents.Methodology: This study was a semi-experimental with a pre-test and post-test design with a control group. Its population was all female students of the secondary high school of Qain city in the academic years of 2021-2022, which numbeer of 45 people of them were selected by purposive sampling method and randomly replaced in three equal groups. Each of the experimental groups separately was trained 10 of sessions 90 minute with motivational psychotherapy and cognitive behavioral therapy methods, and the control group remained on the waiting list for training. The research tool was Schwinger M, Stiensmeier-Pelster's academic self-handicapping questionnaire (2011), which was implemented in the pre-test and post-test stages. Data were analyzed by univariate analysis of covariance and independent t test in SPSS software.Findings: The results of the present study showed that both motivational psychotherapy and cognitive behavioral therapy reduced academic self-handicapping in adolescents, and the effectiveness of motivational psychotherapy in compared to the cognitive behavioral therapy was higher in reducing academic self-handicapping in adolescents (P<0.001).Conclusion: According to the results of this study, it is necessary to use both motivational psychotherapy intervention and cognitive behavioral therapy methods, especially motivational psychotherapy method in reducing academic self-handicapping. Therefore, counselors and psychologists can use the motivational psychotherapy method along with other effective methods to reduce academic self-handicapping.
