Authors

1 PhD student in Entrepreneurship Management, Sari Branch, Islamic Azad University of Sari, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Sari Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sari, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Sari Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sari, Iran

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to identify the preferred learning style and dominant behavioral patterns of students and to investigate the relationship between the two with entrepreneurial components.
Methodology: The present study was applied in terms of purpose and descriptive-survey in terms of the type of research. The current study method was based on the grounded theory qualitative research method, which was selected through interviews with 12 experts, including faculty members of universities and members working in the profession, including various professional categories, by purposeful snowball sampling. Took. The classification of data, interviews, was analyzed based on the first two stages of the three-stage system of Strauss and Corbin, i.e., open and axial coding, and subcategories were obtained. This study's statistical population was undergraduate students of technical and engineering, basic sciences, and humanities of the Ferdowsi University of Mashhad in the academic year 1397-98. The sample size was determined using Cochran's formula of 245 people, and the respondents were selected by stratified sampling method. The researcher-made questionnaire of individual entrepreneurial components was collected and analyzed with SPSS 23 and Lisrel software.
Results: The findings of the study indicate that most of the students had a result-oriented behavioral pattern and in the technical and engineering field most students had an extroverted and task-oriented behavioral model with a convergent dominant learning style; In the field of basic sciences, most students had an introverted and task-oriented behavioral model adapted to the preferred learning style, and in the humanities, most students had an extroverted and people-centered behavioral model with a divergent preferential learning style.
Conclusion: there was a significant relationship between learning style and students' behavioral patterns. Findings can improve personal, academic, and occupational cognition as effectively and efficiently as possible in the path of metacognition.
 

Keywords

احدی فاطمه. (1388). سبک یادگیری دانشجویان پرستاری و پیراپزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی سمنان، مجله علمی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی سمنان، 11(2): 147-141.
حسینیان س، عظیمی پور پ.، کرمی ا.، یزدی م.، کشاورزگرامی ق. (1391). بررسی ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی آزمون‌های تیپ‌های شخصیتی نه گانه (انیگرام)، مشاوره شغلی و سازمانی، 4(12): 144-125.
رادفر محمدرضا، زمردیان غلامرضا، علیقلی منصوره، مینویی مهرزاد، حنیفی فرهاد. (1398). طراحی و تبیین مدل بومی ویژگیهای فردی کار آفرین جهت انتخاب سرمایهگذاری مخاطرهپذیر در شرکتهای نوپا. فصلنامه مدیریت کسب و کار، (34).
رضایی ‌لیلا، ‌احدی ‌حسن‌ و ‌اسدزاده ‌حسن. (1394). پیش‌بینی ‌انگیزش ‌پیشرفت ‌براساس ‌سبک‌های یادگیری کلب در ‌دانش‌آموزان‌ دوره متوسطه شهر تهران. ‌دانش‌و‌پژوهش‌ در‌ روانشناسی کاربردی، 16(3‌): 41-34.
سیف علی‌اکبر. (1380). روان‌شناسی پرورشی، روان‌شناسی یادگیری و آموزش. تهران: آگاه.
عبادی غ، دلاور ع.، نجاریان ب. (1382). بررسی ساختار عاملی پرسشنامه شخصیت 16 عاملی کتل فرم FP- E16E، مجله علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، 10(1 و 2): 83-100.
عسکری فر کاظم. (1397). ارائه الگوی آموزشی توسعه توانمندی‌های کارآفرینانه در دانش-آموزان با میانجی‌گری ویژگی‌های شخصیتی. توسعه کارآفرینی، 11(1)- شماره پیاپی 39، 101-120.
گرانمایه مهرناز، خاکبازان زهره، درویش آسیه، حقانی حمید. (1390). تعیین سبک یادگیری دانشجویان پرستاری و مامایی و ارتباط آن با پیشرفت تحصیلی، مجله پژوهش پرستاری، 6(22): 15-6.
هرگنهان بی آر و السون متیو اچ. (2009). مقدمه‌ای بر نظریه‌های یادگیری، ترجمه علی‌اکبر سیف (1391)، ویرایش هشتم، تهران: دوران.
هرگنهان بی آر و السون متیو اچ. (2005). مقدمه‌ای بر نظریه‌های یادگیری، ترجمه علی‌اکبر سیف (1388)، چاپ چهاردهم، تهران: دوران.
Bandura A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. http://www.merel.org/products/nate.pp. 139-145.
Barrett T. (2010). The problem‐based learning process as finding and being in flow. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(2): 165-174.
Chinaris T. (2016). Professionalism: The Right Choice.
Hahn D, Minola T, Bosio G, Cassia L. (2020). The impact of entrepreneurship education on university students’ entrepreneurial skills: a family embeddedness perspective. Small Business Economics, 55(1): 257-282.
Hematiyan A, Omidvari M (2014). Investigating impact of job satisfaction on rate of human reliability using Heart technique. Int J Curr Life Sci, 4(2): 319-22.
Henkel T G. (2018). A Field Study: Managers’ Work Behavioral Styles. The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning, 14(1): 30.
Henkel T G. (1992). Factor analysis of the personal profile system. The Journal of experimental education, 60(3): 271-280.
Li YS, Chen PS, Tsai SJ. (2008). A Comparison of the Learning Styles among Different Nursing Programs in Taiwan: Implications for Nursing Education. Nurse Educ Today; 28(1): 70-76.
Linton G, Klnton M. (2019). University entrepreneurship education: a design thinking approach to learning. journal of innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1-11.
Marston W M. (2013). Emotions of normal people. Routledge.
Matviuk S G. (2010). A Study of Peruvian Entrepreneurs Leadership Expectations. Journal of American Academy of Business Cambridge. 16(1):65- 70.
Omidvari M. (2010). Industrial Accident investigating and analysis. Tehran: Industrial Management Publication.
Piane G, Rydman R J, Rubens A J. (1996). Learning style preferences of public health students. J Med Syst, 20(6): 377-84.
Sadler-Smith E, Tsang F. (1998). A comparative study of approaches to studying in Hong Kong and the United Kingdom British. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63: 81- 93.
Sen S, Yilmaz A. (2012). The effect of learning styles on students' misconceptions and self- efficacy for learning and performance. Journal Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46: 1482-1486